Should you have ever asked the question, “Do Doctors intentionally kill their patients?” then sadly the answer is yes, and its done with relative ease.
How is this done? In a setting such as an ICU, nursing home or GP Doctor performing home visits to the elderly; all an environment where death is a possible or likely outcome. From early on a Lead Doctor can include false notes or observations. The patient would be unsuspecting, and does not have access to see what is recorded. Maintaining these false notes over an extended period, and then ending the patients life in a manner in-line to match the reported illness, this would then go undetected or un-investigated. You might consider this “medical grooming”
Investigations would surely discover this? Sadly not. Investigations are conducted in accordance with Civil law, which only allows the use of Hospital or Doctors notes as accepted evidence. There is also a concerted and focused effort, with sometimes absurd reasons, to invalidate or disregard any hard evidence submitted by the patients relatives that conflicts with these hospital notes
Consider a possible scenario, Dr Harold Shipman, with some estimates of 150 or more patients falling victim to his heinous practice. Do you think it was only the 150th patients’ relative that expressed concerns regarding this Doctor? Highly unlikely, but it is likely this GPs advanced notes matched the fatal outcome and there was no further reason to investigate, since the outcome was expected
This is a true diarised story of how a Doctor can evade criminal investigation from being the cause of death of a child by simply documenting a different illness and symptoms to the one presented. It shows how departmental colleagues will deliberately cause suffering and death of a child, and how a Hospital will assist in developing a false diagnosis to support the original dishonest and incapable Doctor. The systems in place to protect patients and register complaints have no effect as they will only allow representation of events from the Hospital notes (Civil law), which can easily be shown to be false and deliberately incomplete.
In 2018 my 22 month old daughter Alina died from a very treatable illness. She had an extensive history of 40 GPs and A&E visits all recognising the same viral illness [chronic], with one GP advising that this could easily develop into seizures. Sadly, this [seizure] happened at 18 months old, and was admitted into the care of Dr Hugo Sampaio at Sydney Children’s Hospital
Dr Sampaio chose to ignore and withhold [from the Hospital Notes] the medical history, as well as the clinical symptoms, and developed a treatment plan and medications for a genetic cause instead, these had no effect. The parents questioned these choices and became suspicious of his activity and responses. The father started to record the meetings and video the progress. Within 6 weeks Alina suffered significant brain damage from neglect.
The parents dismissed Dr Sampaio and requested a departmental colleague to take over. After re-visiting the [undocumented] medical history, it was a agreed this was indeed in line with the treatable condition of viral/autoimmune encephalitis. An autoimmune/viral drug was trialled and within the week it showed significant and notable improvement in stopping the seizures. However, this also demonstrated that Dr Sampaio lacked communication, documentation and ability, as well as failing to uphold the Medical code of practice. Against the parents wishes, the departmental colleagues withheld the effective medication, Alina’s condition returned to heavy seizures. The parents were forced to request palliative care due to their forced suffering.
Regardless that every test, including the full genome [from the US] had returned no suggestion of a genetic illness, the Hospital fabricated one, claiming this was the cause, and of course this was in agreement with Dr Sampaio initial pursuit
At the review by the HCCC and Medical Board the father submitted [a brief overview of] the medical history, email communications with Dr Sampaio, images, and the audio and video of events during the 5 months stay. The HCCC rejected their use without reason.
Dr Sampaio submitted untruthful statements, easily disproved with the audio and video evidence
The Medical Board found in favour of Dr Sampaio.
In the same year, 2018 an identical illness with the exact symptoms and positive returned tests that Dr Sampaio had ignored was treated with a similar autoimmune/viral drug to Alina. The patient made a full recovery as the Doctor recognised this quickly as the treatable condition of Autoimmune/viral encephalitis
If you find yourself in a similar situation the following information will be of great help. The link between Chronic Enteroviruses (in this case EV71) , HFMD, the Autoimmune disease T1 Diabetes, Vaccine injury, glucose elevation levels and the Ketogenic diet, plus the use of appropriate Autoimmune drugs, like Anakinra. Also included in this diary is an explanation or examples of how the standard testing equipment used to detect viruses and autoimmune diseases fail
Incidentally, Alina had spent a total of 104 days in ICU. The parents were told the cost was an approximate $5000/day. The overall cost to include an overseas genome report and multiple visits to several other departments and medications likely doubled this
The Audio files included in this diary have been clipped to reduce fatigue, since the meetings could be an hour or two long. Every effort has been made to ensure the context is correct and relevant, however if you feel this is not so, please send a request for the unaltered versions